Monthly Archive for July, 2004

Tired

No Gravatar

I’m still at the ECE shops right now. I’m tired, and I’ve been working on this since 11AM, well over 12 hours now. We fried a bunch of stuff not to long ago, broke a sensor, and now for some reason my microcontroller randomly resets whenever I read inputs from at least one of the ports. I haven’t had time to get anything resembling a working encoder going…but I did make a neat looking housing, that doesn’t even use the part I was working on earlier that cut open my finger. We’re going to have an injury section of our demo and presentation, detailing my cuts and burns, and Helya’s 2nd degree burn blister in the shape of a transistor.

Back to troubleshooting this damned thing…maybe Port A will work better than Port B….here’s to hoping.



Edit: Did you know that diodes glow and make a funny high pitched noise when you put them from power to ground backward. Diode shaped burns hurt on your fingers though. Also, I think this compiler just likes to make me re-write code from scratch because it randomly started working again after I did that.

Water into Beer?

No Gravatar

Well, I have been joking for a good long while that I was going to pray that the water at my reception be turned into beer. Now I 100% believe this is possible, and I’m now taking the step to saying that I’m serious about it. That is right, I’m going to pray that the water turn into either beer or wine. I’m starting now, because I think it will help build up my confidence. I’m writing this to tell some of my friends (or any of them that pray, and believe that this is even .0001% chance of happening) also pray with me about this. Rob has requested to say that “Our Lager” at the wedding, and while I don’t know if that is fully appropriate, he had a second approach that involved the saying “swell” or some such thing about how great it would be if the water did turn into beer.

I’m really thinking that this is possible, and I’ll give a few reasons, if you have a moment to read them click the link, and read the rest of the post.

1. This is a great evangelistic opportunity, as well as a good opportunity to open some eyes to what God really thinks about drinking in moderation. There will be a lot of non-Christians, or marginal Christians attending as well as devout Christians. The more devout ones would mostly be up in arms that we were drinking (minus my GodSearch friends and roomates)…especially since it is against the rules according to Ben Hoerr and Happy Leman the two more senior pastors of the church to bring alcohol in the building, and all my non / marginal christian friends would be like “hey, that is pretty damned cool,” and likely be much more interested in a God who loves us enough to supply beer at a non-beer party.
2. Lauren is 100% OK with beer or wine at the wedding if it is miraculously provided. She is the Bride, she makes the rules…not me, so no beer unless it comes in supernaturally.
3. I’ve been asking for a crazy kind of miracle for a long time now, like one I viewed personally instead of just hearing neat stories from people, so I figure I’m about due. Yeah, I’ve prayed for some people and their headaches have gone away, I’ve cast out things that would be difficult to classify as anything but demons, but I’ve never seen any large scale stuff. No cripple people walking, no deaf people hearing, blind seeing, regrown limbs, etc., so it is about time something like that happens. In fact, I know a bunch of people who haven’t seen anything near that cool, and it don’t hurt to play the percentages that say it is about time.
4. Finally, this is a cause everyone I know can get behind. Even my non-religious type of friends can’t deny that if there was a God and he in fact loves us, one definite way of showing it would be to provide free beer. All my other more devout Christian friends can also say, free beer = good, and would be a hella excellent story to tell to people someday down the road.

It is funny, I seriously don’t have nearly as selfish motivations for this like I did at first when I jokingly mentioned it. I really don’t want to be anywhere close to inebriated when I leave the reception, so what good would it be for me to wish for selfish reasons to have beer at my wedding. I don’t need to impress anyone, I don’t care if I do, or if they don’t care…I just want to see something crazy happen that can’t be attributed to anything other than God. You know…his glory, not mine kind of thing. Finally, who can complain about a open bar that didn’t cost me anything.

Edit: I wanted to quickly reference the “Our Lager” just so people would know what I’m talking about…it is a hilarious remake of the Lords Prayer based around beer. I’m cutting a version of it below from a random google search.

Our Lager,
which art in barrels,
hallowed be thy drink.
To thy brewery we will come,
Thy will be drunk,
at home as it is in the tavern.
Give us this day our foamy head,
and forgive us our spillage’s,
as we forgive those who spilled against us.
And lead us not to incarceration,
but deliver us from hangovers.
For this is the beer, the Bitter, the Lager.

BARMEN

Evangelism, Charismatics, and big Mistakes

No Gravatar

As I mentioned before I’ve been reading a community on LJ called Challenging God and there is a recent post that caught my attention. (You really need to read the persons story in there to get what I’m going to talk about.) I got to thinking along two different lines about this topic, so I’m going to break my post up into two sections. This is part of my attempt to make it easier to read and respond to, because I have general problems with organization in my writing.

Evangelism

OK, so maybe this person isn’t a very old Christian, and maybe they aren’t trying to evangelize this group of people and they are just curious what people think, but come on. This story is obviously doing no one any good. Who listens to a story like that and says “Yeah, I want to be a Christian where I can maybe cough up blood and fall on the floor.” That doesn’t even appeal to me, and I’ve seen people do all sorts of stuff before under demonic and holy spirit influences. This part of the charismatic branch of Christianity isn’t appealing to someone right off the bat. I don’t invite people to more serious church stuff unless I think they can be open minded, or already believe at least somewhat in these kinds of things. Church services at the Vineyard are safe for people who aren’t sure, or don’t really buy the charismatic at our church, but that is about it. If this “Challenging God” community is really full of spiritual seekers like it appears there are in there, it doesn’t make sense to challenge their intellect with experiences that don’t hold concretely against intellectual challenges. People falling down, casting out demons, shaking, etc, this is subjective. Turning water into beer (like I’m going to try to do at my wedding…..zing….how would that be for a shift in policy about alcohol), growing back peoples limbs and teeth, praying for someone and their headache or other pains go away. Those are concrete, undeniable to intellect because you can back it up with physical evidence and direct testimony from people.

Also, I was thinking about posting one of those “why don’t you believe in God, why do you hate Christianity” kind of topics in this place, but I was looking for a good way to promote intelligent responses, not just harsh criticism of an experience. This is what happened to this persons post, only people criticizing his/her experience have happened. But the problem is that their criticism isn’t going to change that person, the author has ascribed significance to the event (or God has given it significance depending on how you look at it) and no ones “intellectual” criticism is going to change that. Likewise, no subjective experiences are going to help them see God in the world. More appropriate kinds of posts would have been along the lines of “Would a miracle change your stance on God” or “What do you think about ‘Charismatic’ Christian experiences” or something like that. Not a big long story.

Part Deus, Discerning Things

OK, so in this story there was a guy coughing up blood. This is a problem for me. I’ve seen some wacky stuff, and I’ve cast out demons before, but spitting up blood seems nuts to me. I’ve never had a problem saying “In the name of Jesus, Chill” (you really have to believe you have the right to say that for it to work though) and people pretty much always go limp at that point if something crazy is happening. I’ve never had someone spitting up blood for two hours and making animal noises, and if they did I’m pretty confident I could tell them to “chill” and it would stop. I don’t get how people don’t learn that. Maybe my experiences are limited and I’ve never run into a big enough problem with very deep seeded issues to the point that things got that bad, but I still figure I could get the thing to shut up and hold still. I’m kinda interested if anyone else has prayed for someone like that, and not been able to get the person to hold still.

Now, I don’t think most people really believe that there are demons still around, in fact I think that is what they want. In America today everyone is cynical of everything that can’t be explained, and rightfully so, we’ve been way too inindated with so much crap. This attitude causes some problems though. It seems we either accept it as something that happens and only do spiritual stuff to try to stop it, or we rail on and on about how the person should go to the hospital. Along these lines, how often do we actively try to see if something weird happening is from God, or if it is demonic. I’ve noticed that I have a hard time telling sometimes…especially when you think that people who are shaking are filled with the Holy Spirit and don’t often question that.

There has to be a balance. When people need medical attention (I would have done something medical when they started coughing up blood) you should give them medical attention. But when they need spiritual attention, you should give them that. But how do you tell? Which one do you assume first?

I ran into this problem a while back. The short of the story is that I wasn’t home, I had a test, and I came home about during ministry time of small group. Apparently someone had started to manifest signs of something demonic, and had bolted into the bathroom and locked the door…and then passed out or something, we don’t really know what was up because the door was locked and they weren’t answering. Rob came down immediately deemed the situation a medical problem, and ran around complaining about how we should call the ambulance, and rightfully so, because we didn’t know what happened behind that door. My co-leaders were convinced that this was a spiritual problem, and they eventually got into the bathroom, prayed for the person for a good long while, they got better, a lot better. My small group co-leaders were right in this situation, but they made some mistakes, and Rob was sure to point them out to us. But ultimately the leaders had the context of the situation, they knew what was going on, they were right, and things like this haven’t happened again (to my knowledge) to this person, so it isn’t likely there was ever a medical problem. But Rob was very right in that we weren’t sure they didn’t bang their head when they passed out, or what because the door was closed.

I’m still at a little bit of a loss for this kind of stuff, I have a much more firm idea about what I’m going to do. (Like treat for shock first, then start praying) I definitely am a little pissed that the guys think it is funny to bring this up (since it is sensative issue for the person, and for us as leaders), when it they were ultimately wrong about it being a medical problem, but were only right about the fact that we didn’t know what happened behind the door. I don’t get why other Christians are so adamantly against this kind of stuff, to the point they can’t even admit they don’t know what is going. Also, I don’t know why some other Christians can’t see a medical problem that needs medical attention for what it is.

I did learn something very valuable, and I think that I might push for this to happen, and that is that small group leaders should do Red Cross first aid and CPR training (I do thank Rob a whole bunch for pointing this out in this situation). It should be definitely available through the church and should be strongly encouraged if not mandatory. The “Learning to Minister Like Jesus” class is mandatory, why shouldn’t first aid be as well. Leaders in similar group situations are required to do that, or it is strongly encouraged (like in Boy Scouts where the troop leaders have almost all been trained in first aid and CPR), so why is it that we don’t do that. Jeff, I hope you just read this whole thing, even though it is long, because I think maybe this is something we should do, and I’ll probably bring it up again. Also, I am reminded with or without the church finding a way to bring this training to the people, I want to go get certified for this stuff, because it is extremely useful in many situations.

OK, so I’m interested what other people think about discerning problems…like is it from God, or is it demonic…is it spiritual, or is it a physical problem. How do you tell, what do you commonly do? And how do you approach skeptical intellectuals with your experiences in the Church? Do you tell them all the wacky stuff, or do you just tell them a few small stories about more tangible stuff. Or do you just focus on the way your life is better now than before?

Evangelism

No Gravatar

OK, so I rambled about some negative stuff yesterday, so today I’ll try to be (slightly) more positive.

I’ve made no secret of the fact I’m reading Irresistible Evangelism which is a pretty good book by some Vineyard guys. This is a great book. It is not terribly well written, and like many other Christian books there are about three chapters that could be condensed into one, but it has some great stuff in it. The chapter I have liked the most so far is on Active Listening. It is pretty cool how you can see where you know you have improved in your life at listening to people just be reading the categories in Active listening, but it is bummer to look at the parts that I suck at.

I should write more about this book, because it talks about some pretty good stuff, but I’m tired so I’ll just wrap up by saying I’m really looking forward to getting to Minneapolis and meeting some new people, not just to try this stuff out or anything like that, but more to make new friends and see what wacky stuff God does in their lives. And I do think some wacky stuff is going to happen. I think when you are starting something new, and you just extend your life experiences and your loving kindness to people, cool miraculous stuff will happen. I don’t have a good basis for that, it is more of gut feeling and slightly based on other stories I hear about third world countries. And I really like the team were going with, I’m not sure exactly what niche I’m going to fill yet, or how I will play into this, but this book has made me realize that one of the things I do best is make friends, and people can’t help but notice the difference God makes in your life when they are around you for a while. And I like having lots of friends around, so maybe I can help more people than I was thinking a while back.

That’s it for now…I told you it would be more positive.

BTW, if my website is messed up sometime in the next week or so, it will be because I’m going to install some upgrades, and hopefully get Typekey working with some of the improvements they just released to my blog scripts.

Theology, Good, Bad, Ugly?

No Gravatar

So Jeff has been posting some interesting stuff on some theology things that he has been studying, and I’ve enjoyed responding, arguing and critiquing other peoples arguements, which I always do because I like to debate things (except no one critiques me back, which kinda sucks because I would like to know where I’m screwing up in my arguement). But a couple of things have nagged me in this discussion, and Lauren hit on one of them in a recent post. My problem is, what good is a word or term that is susposed to define something if we can’t pin down the definition and people go around all willy-nilly making their own definitions for it. For example, besides postmodernism, “free will.” What the hell does that mean? I’ve always taken the most simple definition of free will to be “able to make at least one choice based one ones wishes or desires.” Simple right? I got that from the definition of “free” and “will” and added the “at least one” because I’m kind of a minimalist person when it comes to making definitions for a term from the definition of its parts (and engineering tends to define things by the minimum or maximum amount of info the system or theory can describe). But my parents, for example, would say that “free will” would mean going with my definition only taking out the “at least once” part, and subsituting always. Jeff made his own definitions that focused on responsibility. I’ve heard other stuff to, but the point is, what is the definition of “free will” or any other popularly debated topic. And how do you agree on a definition so you have a basis of arguement. In a theology context we of course go to the Bible for definitions. I was amused by one question Jeff had to answer about sin, and he literally just about quoted scripture because there are a ton of times sin is defined. And as far as I can rememer they all pretty much say about the same thing. But I’ve never seen a good definition hashed out for the word sovereign, and I have no idea what the context of the word was in the Hebrew or Greek from that time period. And “free will” is never even mentioned, so how do I define something like that. What good is debating anything when we can argue what the meaning of the word “is” is in our society today, and how do we keep from getting frustrated. Do we agree on a common source of greater collected knowledge, such as the dictionary, encycolpedia, or wikipedia. Do we go with classical theologians ideas and definitions, or do we go with the modern ones? And in the end, once I’ve agreed on the definition of “free will” (or postmodernism or whatever else I could be discussing) what good does that do me when I walk outside to talk about my life experiences as a Christian with any other marginal or non-christian.

And I stumble on to point two that is bothering me. What good are any of these discussions doing in terms of me growing as a person spiritually, or me reaching other people in an evangelistic effort. When I talk to any non-Christian, they assume we make all our decisions autonomously, so to tell them otherwise, or even admitting to believing otherwise would likely be a very quick conversations stopper. And it would get me labeled pretty quickly in their minds, and put me out of any short term evangelistic opportunities. I’ve been reading a fairly active community on LiveJournal called Challenging God which is populated by militant and close minded atheists, agnostics, pagans, etc., as well as very open minded atheists, agnostic, pagans, etc, and some Christians who also go in both directions sometimes. It is great, it is raw, and if it were discussing politics it would drive me up a wall because it would take far to much stuff as relative which I can’t agree with in politics, but religion, I can stomach that. I have noticed that spouting theology to any of these people would be worthless. Many of them are as read or more read in anti-Christian, and anti-religion skepticism / objectivism type of books than I am of Christian matters. So they know all the arguments against their thinking, and they see themselves as the oppressed religious minority, much like how devote Christians tend to feel oppressed by government and society recently (there was an actual post on this not long ago). I am following this to see some of the opposition I am going to get in Minneapolis on the extreme end of anti-religious people. I want to see inside their heads, know how they think, why they feel how they do, how they arrived at these conclusions. I haven’t posted anything just yet, but that is because I want to have more then rhetoric, more then theology to throw back at the people on there, I want to share myself and how I feel, and why I think what I do, and maybe ask questions to provoke thoughts in others like they are me. That is what theology should be. Not frivolously arguing on the nature of God, how he judges people, and how he does things. But instead we should go more to what Morphew talked about. That is the kind of theology I want to be interested in, something that is biblically built up to inspire me to action. A way to see the world working around me, in me, and God working in that world. I don’t want to get bogged down with fringe edge stuff about what God is thinking, and how he is doing stuff. I want to talk about what he is doing, what it should look like based on the Bible, and what the Bible says about how I can get in the game to work with God. That is what excited me about the “Kingdom Theology”, so maybe I’ll back out of these interesting discussions for a while, and keep reading my “Irresistible Evangelism” book which is providing me with some thought provoking valid ways of doing things to better myself and the message that I feel is important to share. Plus it has some great advice in it about evangelism that actually will work really well just to make you a better a friend if you can put it into practice.

OK, I’m tired now, and I ranted a little long, and I might not like this in the morning, but it was bugging me now, so I felt like I had to write about it. I reserve the right to be too tired, and wrong, but I will decide that more officially in the morning.

RSVP joo FOOLZ!!!

No Gravatar

OK, so I put the l33t speak in the title, I apologize, but I had to get your attention. Now that I have, RSVP you silly fools. We need these things in soon because we need to order food. If you are pretty sure you are coming tell us you are, so we can plan for you. We can always have extra food, that is no problem, Rob Alex and my family will give it a good home I’m sure.

Also, if you know someone who talks to people more than I do tell them to email me. Like for example, Matt Hong could tell Peter to talk to Arun and Justin. This can continue until everyone has RSVPed. Please do that soon if you have not, even if we know you are coming, just so we have a record of how many people are planning on being there.

Tice hasn’t RSVPed yet, I think that is odd, since he is planning on coming right? Oh well, maybe I’ll just email him.

The Balcony

No Gravatar

Also known as the veranda, the bridge, the watch tower, and the duck watching station. We like to go out on the fire escape while our older co-worker smokes and we talk about things. Lately it has been very much about how we are going to start pirating. And I don’t mean stealing music, or software, I mean dressing up with swords and single shot pistols and boarding cruise ships and stealing their buffet lines.

Today was interesting. This massive storm passing by caught our attention on the computer weather thing, so we decided to venture outside onto our perch two stories above the bone-yard. While we were there I watched some of the most amazing swirling of clouds I have ever seen. One big pocket of swirliness came right down and looked like it was going to land on our heads. So we went inside because we feared dying.

That was fun, but now I’m stuck at work, waiting for the rain to blow over. But I got some stuff working on my senior design project. I’m hoping it works well with some stuff I”m trying to add right now.

Little Photoshop Fun

No Gravatar

I had an idea during the conference after I saw a Vineyard Music tee-shirt, and I made up a fairly quick…although not quick enough since I suck at photoshop…logo design for the church. I know LeQue made up some really good ones, but I figured “Hey, I’m feeling creative right now….might as well throw another idea into the mix” So anyway the link is here so check it out. I might screw around with it some more, I’m not sure if I liked how the bevel and emboss layer style turned out….the M under the V didn’t turn out quite how I wanted it to, but this works for now…besides, I’m tired of using photoshop at the moment.

Collection of Thoughts

No Gravatar

The conference was totally amazing this week. Some things became much more clear about our movements theological basis, and there were some great tips on prayer. I never thought of just praying the Psalms before, so now I’m doing that, and it is a great way to start my day. Not to mention I’ve been avoiding praying in the morning in general because I’m barely coherent in the morning, so I usually pray till I fall asleep at night. But this takes the pressure off to think about what I’m going to pray about, and there is more power in the scriptures than your average scientist / engineer would care to admit, so it covers a lot of my bases for the morning. Also, the last two days praying the Psalms before I get in the shower has made me remember more to pray for people in the shower. This is good because I can pray about stuff that is bothering me internally, or the people that I forget to pray for sometimes before I fall asleep.

Dave Schmelzer was an awesome speaker all around. He speaks a lot like I think, that was weird. He managed to pull his tangents back together better than I usually do though. He is so cool that I am going to tell you that you can listen to his sermons at http://www.cambridgevineyard.org, so go check it out and see if any of his sermon titles interest you.

Thanks to Monica Lin, and Kelley Shimmin I have been thinking about some stuff about post-modernism. Does anyone else notice that people around my age and younger don’t like being called either modern or postmodern. Also, there is a large segment of the population that is my brothers age looking for a sharp return to tradition. I talked with my Dad about this and he didn’t think it was so much of a shift culturally as it is disillusionment with postmodernism and modernisms rebellion against tradition and science. But I will write on this later, I mainly mentioned it because I made up a name for this phenomenon, and I will use it until I or someone else comes up with a better name. That name is enlightened postmodernism. I’m throwing the word enlightened in front of it not because I think people are smarter now, or they think more or something, but because post-postmodernism doesn’t sound very nice, and because I think that there is a large group of people who are not so much rebelling against postmodernism as they are accepting the scientific or hard truths that hold as sound generalizations brought about by modern techniques, and acknowledging the importance of peoples relationships feelings, and the meta-themes (as Kelley put it) that are also important. I know I’m not the first person to think of this, I’ve talked with James about it before, the tension between modernism and postmodernism, but I have had some more coherent thoughts on it lately in trying to figure out where I fit in culture today.

Finally, as I mentioned before, the theology stuff from the conference was great. Derek Morphew amazed me. At first I thought he was a vibrant speaker, but was focusing more on the academics of the theology than my poor little sleep deprived eye-lids could handle, but then in the second session he talked I felt much more enthusiasm start to swell up as he spoke on the more personal aspects of this theology. Then toward the end of the third session I knew something big was up. Even before he stopped speaking I could feel the electricity of anticipation grow in the crowd. If you are one of those people who is very skeptical about “feelings” and how the holy spirit uses them I don’t think you could ignore this. By the time he was done speaking and moved into the ministry time I practically couldn’t hold down my excitement. I knew something was happening, and I knew it was going to be big. And when all of the people in a room are either praying for someone, or being prayed for you know God is really moving. This is, as Happy put it (our senior pastor), “like the old Vineyard conferences.” “This is something that you are going to hear people talk about in the future as one of those life changing conferences.” That was probably my most powerful encounter with that kind of thing, and I didn’t even have anything drastic happen to me, I mostly just prayed for Dirk, and watched the people around me some. If you believe that God doesn’t do miracles today, or you are skeptical about how God changes peoples lives come talk to me, I have some stories from the conference that I can share, and I would love to talk to you about it. The speaker, even without that amazing ministry time, has given me a clearer idea on how to articulate this amazing theology, this amazing way of looking at the world, to others, and I am holding a strong passion to share it at the moment. And this is small changes in how people tend to look at Jesus ministry. This stuff is sound theology, and very close, maybe even completely compatible, with any existing sound theologies in other churches. It is really just a realization of one of the ways God works today.

Well, see, there you have it….I’m already rambling on and on about it so you know I’m excited about it. But seriously…a little skeptical of this stuff, which you probably should be because your an American damnit and we’re skeptical of everything, you should talk to me, cuz this stuff is hot….the life-changing, world view shifting, and spiritually accelerating kind of hot.

Finally, I had to miss the annual “Drunken Barn Dance” this year. Lauren and I are both sick, and last year I didn’t have nearly as much fun when she wasn’t there. It just isn’t cool to dance with your friends the way it is cool to dance with your fiance. And if she couldn’t go, then there didn’t seem much point in me going. Plus, I really really really needed the extra sleep. I slept like 4 hours last night and woke up feeling like crap. That means I probably would have ended up being grouchy and a pain in the ass for the people who did go, so they are probably better off without me So I’m bummed I missed that, but it seemed a much wiser choice to stay at home and try to get healthy so I can focus in on my classes this coming week. Grades first, party later….I hate being old and getting responsible.

Well, with that, I’m done with my thoughts that are sharable (I’m working up a political scheme, but for it to work, I can’t share it with any more people than I already have) so now off to bed to get some more of that much needed sleep.

Voting the Issues

No Gravatar

So, another part of voting that people don’t think about is Voting on the Issues. Most all of us have pet peeves about the government and personal agendas that we feel are ignored by our countries politicians. We all have ideologies that can’t be fully supported by our government in the real world. My political ideology is for the government to step out of the big brother role, both socially and economically. I think personal responsibility is more important than government mandating things for us, and picking up the pieces for the lazy people in this country. Also, on a more practical level I want term limits for supreme court justices, maybe around 12 years with a third of them being rotated every 4 years, still appointed by the president, but the appoints take place about six months after inauguration.

It is stupid for me to rail on about my ideology, and my personal desires, and it is silly for me to try to tell you all why you should vote like me because my ideas about the supreme court are best. It accomplishes nothing. There is no party right now that agrees with me on all the issues. Unfortunately there is no party that is even close right now, and some of my personal desires to see the government change aren’t even mentioned anywhere in any of the parties platforms. So, how do I vote then? Important issues that I feel must be addressed aren’t getting addressed. Kids starve all over the place because of dictators in power, why do we only go after a few of them?

Sorry, there isn’t much we can do about these issues, but I will talk briefly about how to make these issues heard. One way to get your issues in the eyes of politicians is to buy a major news media outlet, a newspaper, a TV station, and broadcast all the atrocities across the world as they happen. Especially the ones our country is ignoring. Or broadcast and write about the shortcomings of our current government system. Since most of us don’t have that kind of money, I will suggest another alternative. Start your own political party that focuses on the issues you see as most important. Work hard at educating people why these issues are important. Become that third party worth voting for I was talking about in my last political post.

Now, since most of us are lazy or uninterested in being under the media magnifying glass, we aren’t likely to do either of these things. So, what do you do now. You’ve already decided that you don’t have the resources to force your issues onto an existing political parties platform or start your own party, so you are left with no choice but to pick from the people available. So, now you must begin the process of decided which platform has the most stuff you care about on, and which platform agrees with you the most on those issues.

There is a very nice test at theLibertarian Parties webpage. That link will take you right to the test. This test does a good job of sorting out the stances on the issues that are included on everyones platform.

After you take that test and find out which party you agree with on the major issues that are mentioned on every platform, you must find out what the rest of the platform says. These third parties have some wacky stuff on their platforms sometimes and that stuff can make it so you don’t want to vote them, even if you agree with them on the major issues. The second part is much much harder because it means wading through the long winded platforms yourself, while that test does a nice job of cutting the main points out of the platforms, so you can get right to the chase.

Also, I’ve gotten tired lately of listening to people talk about these kinds of non-issues, especially since I know no one wants to really do anything political about it, but it is even worse that if motivated to do something political those same people are so fixated on their issues not being acknowledged that they haven’t thought out the consequences and repercussions of those actions. Like if we were to just stop giving money to Israel, Turkey, and the UN, backed out all our forces, and sent them all the the most impoverished, aids ridden, and genocidal African countries, (which is just about the only way to pay for the aid Africa really requires) where would we be. We would be out of the UN taking away any of its military power (we are the UN forces, don’t kid yourself into thinking the French, Russians or Germans ever actually contribute to the UN with any real numbers compared to us) making it almost useless. Our economy would start to feel the serious tug from having forces always squelching dictatorial, and homicidal governments. Working to force them to no longer be corrupt, and then hear all the papers talk about what assholes Americans are, thinking they can run the whole world, installing leadership with our own interests. All the while our economy starts to collapse cuz our military is spread far to thin over an entire continent. And still, we haven’t even begun to address the human rights issues in Asia, that mess would probably be even bigger because there are some countries with some teeth that could make it hell to police them. But instead we help the countries who suit our best interests, financially, politically, ethically, and the UN ignores those places in Africa, like Rwanda. And America catches the blame for doing something internationally, other than talking, because we can’t help everyone at once. There are almost exclusively Americans in Iraq right now, why isn’t the UN doing something about that genocide in other countries, why aren’t the Germans, French, Russians, or any other country doing something. You may not like my assessment of how to think out the situation in Iraq or Africa, and that is OK, so I’ll use another example. Thinking out the issues completely on my supreme court thing, would mean more than just what I listed. Start with the Supreme court. I’ve put some thought into them, and like I said, 12 year limits, one term per person, rotate a third of them out every four years, about six months after inauguration. But now we’ve restructured the Supreme court, made it slightly harder for it to get stale, and for them to not feel overly comfortable on their seats. But they still aren’t being held accountable for when they make laws instead of interpret them, which they do. But even worse yet, I haven’t touched the appellate courts, or the federal district courts. Those guys are easily the most ridiculous right now. They make laws, and the constitution say whatever they want. And what is with them using constitutional review, if the courts have that power, it should be left for the Supreme Court in my opinion. There is no accountability in the courts when it takes to long, and is to much hassle to impeach appointed judges. This leaves judges open to do just about anything they want in terms of making laws say things that they don’t. I don’t have a good way to keep track of that many judges, it would be far to expensive and would take too much effort, and create bureaucratic positions of almost more power than the judges. So since I don’t have a good complete solution to work out for the courts, and it isn’t of interested to any party at all, I usually just discuss what would be some better ways to fix the problem…unless I’m presenting the problem for those who are unaware of what has been happening in the courts of late, and then I shut up about it. Because complaining about the president, or about our situation in this place or that doesn’t do anything if we haven’t thought out what we feel is the best solution and the consequences to that solution. And it does even less, if it isn’t on a parties platform and you aren’t working to get it on there.

So, what I’m getting at here, is that you have to read the party platforms, as well as doing a little research about the individual candidates positions, because they will tend to lean toward the parties stance in times of indecision. And if you think something should be on a platform, write officials, educate your neighbors about it, and come up with a solution that has attempted to see as many of the consequences as possible before hand. Don’t just vote for someone because of your non-platform related issues, you won’t change anything. And don’t just complain, especially about one person (the president) instead look up the facts. See what the Clinton administration did to create the situation that Bush took over from him, look at the elder Bushes administration, and Regan’s. Do you really think we are economically unsound right now because Bush screwed it up? Look for facts, back that up, look at economic trends (and you will see how the Regan administrations policies are still effecting us today), see the big picture, before you vote just to get one guy out of office only to put another in that isn’t any better.

Hope that makes sense…if my African and supreme court examples don’t make sense about what I’m getting at here, ask me, and I’ll write some other ones. Now, I must go the Vineyard Regional Conference, so I will see you all later.

Mercy Vineyard Slogans

No Gravatar

Everyone around the house is trashing on the slogan on the Mercy Vineyard webpage which is “Mercy Vineyard: a hopeful church.” I’m not a huge fan either, but I don’t think it sucks like they do.

But anyway, they are trying to come up with new better ones. So far we have:

Mercy Vineyard: we gots food.

Mercy Vineyard: Kicking it with Christ

Mercy Vineyard: Appealing to your stomach
Mercy Vineyard: Pants Optional

Mercy Vineyard: Have you ever gone to church…..on weed

Mercy Vineyard: chicken soup for the cockles, maybe even the sub-cockles

Mercy Vineyard: Better cookies than the church down the street

Mercy Vineyard: No pants, no faith, no problem

Mercy Vineyard: No we don’t make wine….in the building

Mercy Vineyard…..Punch and Pie

Mercy Vineyard: First 100 people through the door receive a free tickle-me-Jesus

Mercy Vineyard: If we can’t exorcise it, you don’t pay

Mercy Vineyard: We put the fun in dysfunctional

Mercy Vineyard: don’t worry, this is like short bus church

Mercy Vineyard: It’s like trailer park church, only dumber

Mercy Vineyard: No worship related injuries in 47 days

Mercy Vineyard: Yes, we’ll pray for the Vikings too

Mercy Vineyard: It will knock you off your ass

Mercy Vineyard: Because we didn’t want to get up at 10:30 in the morning either

Mercy Vineyard: you had us at hello

Mercy Vineyard: Please, don’t feed the choir

Mercy Vineyard: Stop clapping, your just encouraging him

Mercy Vineyard: Now with Vegan approved sacrificial lambs

Mercy Vineyard: Free coffee and it’s cheaper than a movie

Of all these I think it like the “No pants, no faith, no problem” the best.
Anyway, that was our amusement for the night.

Two Party Politics

No Gravatar

The election is coming up, and I read a lot of news, and I’ve very interested in the science of politics…i.e. sociology, psychology and what-not, so I thought I would post a guide to help some people who just listen to what the media tells them, and talk a little about the how a two party system benefits and hurts our country.

First of all, there has almost always been only two strong parties in American politics. It started with Jefferson disagreeing with Hamilton and it turned into the federalist and anti-federalist parties. It has pretty much been two since then. There have been periods of transition where one party steps in and starts creating a stir and then there are three major parties, but what happens is sometime shortly after that the weakest of the three (usually the one most closely resembling the new third party) dies out and it leaves two again. There are several advantages to this system, and more broadly how we elect officials in general. First off, we elect people directly, we don’t vote for a party and then they get a proportional number of seats to how many votes they got (thats the other system used), so individual people are accountable to their constituents. In that other system, they are just accountable to the party, but this allows for more parties, so it is a bit of a trade-off. Also, two parties means there is usually only two sides to an issue. One with the majority and one with the minority. The party whips are the people who try to make sure everyone in the party votes the same way. While on the surface this seems like a bad idea, because people aren’t always being represented, it can yield some good results. Such as significant legislation getting passed instead only wishy-washy changes happening, which is what happens when there is more than two parties. Two parties makes it easy to vote when you aren’t particularly concerned with what seems to be major election platforms. You know that the Rep’s are conservative and will elect mostly strict interpretationist to the Supreme court, so if you don’t care about much else, you can vote for republicans (or democrats if you like loose-interpretationist judges) All in all two parties provides balance, and keeps a broad range of people supported without giving the crazies on the end of the spectrum the ability to hinder laws passing that the majority of Americans want passed.

Alternatives to the two party system provide some interesting insight into this matter. Germany uses a system that ends up with more than two parties and manages OK. That system is a proportional representation like I mentioned before, where a party receives a portion of the seats in the congress based on how much of the populations vote they received. The advantage of a system like this is that it allows new ideas to be more easily introduced into the house and the congress. And it allows the fringe ends of ideological spectrum to be represented directly in the congress. This system also takes away the geographic factors that are normally present in government. That means that a third party has little chance of winning anything unless they are geographically centralized in America, but in a proportional system they don’t have to be to win seats in congress. This forces other parties to cater more to the new ideas, and to be a little more progressive instead of what we have here with our politicians afraid to rock the party boat because it will end up in political suicide.

To fix the problems and bridge the gaps in the US we have to take a new stand against our two parties. People in politics only listen to your votes, not what they will perceive as apathy…i.e. not voting, or writing in Mickey Mouse (what I almost did last time). So we have to vote for a third party to send a message. We must pick that third party that most closely represents what we would like to see the two main parties change toward and vote for them. Also, we have to help them campaign, and explain our positions about third parties to less informed people, to help them understand this is the best way to gain better representation in the government.

Now, the average American can’t handle a third party. It would confuse them, they grew up with two parties, and two parties is what they know. The people who can handle a third party aren’t much better in some ways because we will default to what we know in moments of indecision. An example is when I went to the polls last year I didn’t want to vote for Bush or Gore. I knew their platforms, and I was unimpressed by both, but I knew the party platforms and the general ideologies that each party stood for, and I voted for Bush because I knew that in the very least there would be judges appointed to the federal courts that were more conservative, and more importantly followed a more strict interpretation of the law, which is important to me. But if we threw a third party in the mix, a lot of people would either follow the party they “know” and blindly love instead of checking the actual issues. How many times have you walked into a booth and seen a bunch of people you don’t know anything about and just voted your party alignment. I’m guilty of that, because I didn’t have time to find out what the local city clerk thought about gun control, I was busy sifting through the ten pounds of BS that the news slants at me every day to figure out what a presidential candidates actual stance on the issues are. So I default. But if we could educate people, and turn them on to what a real third party could do to improve our current political system, we could actually change the nature of things.

Now, later tonight or tomorrow I’m going to write on voting the issues, because I think a lot of people idealize the parties they think they like, instead of finding actual stances on issues, but for now I will say that one way to get things changed is to enter into politics with at least your vote, and hopefully a little more than that so you can educate ignorant people who get their news from the Daily Show. So vote smart, find out the issues, try not to default as much in this political climate where the Republicans and Democrats aren’t listening to the people but the media instead. And don’t just by the hype….Bush isn’t stupid, Kerry isn’t the opposite of Bush so voting for him just to get Bush out isn’t a smart reason to vote for him either. A smart vote if you don’t want things to continue how they are currently (with or without Bush in office) is an informed third party vote this election, so check out the Green party, the Libertarian party, and of course Ralph Nader the independent candidate.